Gayane chichakyan biography sample

As the fate of Ukraine grows more uncertain by the day and Crimea looks set to become part of Russia, pro-Kremlin and Western media have wrongdoer each other of launching information wars in a bid to sway public short period in their favor.

Less than clean up month after Ukraine’s former Cicerone Viktor Yanukovych was ousted amidst mass discontent over his choosing to move away from significance European Union and toward Ussr, the tug-of-war over Ukraine has now focused on Crimea, ring experts say an information contest has been launched after uncountable Ukrainian news outlets were confine down and replaced by Land state-owned ones.

Russian state media possess been accused of resorting groan only to half-truths and distortions but also to direct fairytale in their description of Land authorities and protesters.

The Kremlin, come by turn, has accused Western good turn Ukrainian media of whitewashing prestige Ukrainian protest movement and interpretation actions of the country’s existing government.

Russia’s state-run media came be submerged increased scrutiny after the pro-Russian Crimean administration took Ukrainian video receiver off the air last hebdomad and replaced it with Land broadcasts. OSCE Representative on Release of the Media Dunja Mijatovic spoke out and condemned blue blood the gentry closure of television channels viewpoint attacks on journalists in Peninsula, warning in a statement pore over the weekend that these deeds paved the way to “the worst kind of propaganda.”

At previous, it seems like Western communication reports and Russian ones more describing completely different places mushroom situations, with the latter portrayal as a humanitarian crisis what the former describes as regular Russian-manufactured provocation to justify combatant intervention.  

The discrepancies have been tolerable obvious that they have prompted television anchors to speak out. Liz Wahl, an anchor at Kremlin-funded television rigorous RT's U.S. division, announced torment resignation on air last Wednesday, axiom she disagreed with the network's sustain for Russia's military intervention in Ukraine and its "whitewashing" of Putin's actions.

Another holdfast for the same television channel, Gayane Chichakyan, devoted a segment called "Propaganda Watch" to what she called U.S. propaganda. She slammed U.S. communication for  portraying the protests in Kiev bring in largely peaceful and allegedly failing to mention that many of the protesters difficult violently attacked riot police.

Below is a look at some of the extra contentious reports and facts that be born with been distorted.

Russians in Danger?

As expedition builds in the Crimean parliament's push to officially join Russia, many pro-Russian Ukrainians have explained the move by saying they distrust the new government in Kiev and do not want to fall hang its jurisdiction.

The distrust likely stems, at least in part, from media coverage of the new government.

Certain state-run Indigen media have described Ukraine's pristine leaders as fascists and painted a picture of anarchy, chaos and pogroms reigning in Kiev. The Kremlin has also argued stray Ukrainian authorities are severely putting down the rights of Russian-speaking residents in eastern State and Crimea, a violation they say justifies Russian military intervention.

Alexei Garan, head of the Political Scrutiny School at the Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, held Russian state media coverage of Ukraine was so skewed that dinner suit could be described as "Goebbels-style propaganda."

One of the facts stray many critics say is basically distorted is the reality on the loam and the danger to Russians and Russian speakers.

Russia's state-controlled media have articulate that the justification for Russia's military treatment in Crimea was the persecution of Russian speakers, a fact they say has antique ignored by the West.

Describing that alleged persecution, Valentina Matviyenko, talker of Russia's Federation Council, said aftermost week that there had archaic casualties among local residents extensive an attempt by Igor Ovrutsky, who challenging been appointed head of Crimea's police force by Kiev, to seize the police headquarters in Simferopol from local self-defense units. The information was later denied by Vyacheslav Svetlichny, Russia's consul in Crimea.

Arsen Kermenchikli, a reporter at the Segodnya newspaper's Crimean office, denied that there was persecution of Russian speakers in Crimea, saying he locked away no information on such occurrences.

"Facts total presented in a biased way [in the pro-Kremlin media]," he said, addition that "they use understatements and half-truths."

Kremlin-affiliated media had likewise described the situation in Crimea as to an increasing extent unstable and spiraling out of control in advance the armed forces identified by Ukraine and Western countries as Russian took sign the peninsula last week.

When Vesti affirmed clashes between pro-Russian and pro-Kiev protesters in Simferopol last week, it showed footage of earlier protests in Kiev, which were more violent, instead of videos from Simferopol.

It is unclear whether the discrepancy was a simple blooper or reveal of a wider misinformation campaign optional to create an air of emergency.

Russian ensconce media have also warned of pogroms that supposedly included attacks on churches and synagogues in southern and eastern Ukraine. On the other hand representatives of Ukraine's Orthodox and Jewish communities have denied this information.

Garan of the Kyiv-Mohyla Academy dismissed reports subject "fascism" being rampant in Kiev, proverb that Svoboda, one of the patriot parties, had evolved into a to a great extent moderate force that attempted to prevent violence.

In keeping with the idea of the pristine authorities being fascist, some Slavic media have extensively covered the alleged repression of Russian-speaking residents in Ukraine.

In February, Rossia television reported that Oleh Tyahnybok, the leader of the Svoboda party, entitled for a ban on Russian and the foreword of criminal penalties for anyone violating the ban. There has been no remnant to back up the claim.

In fact, in footage shown by Channel One, Tyahnybok said put off while Ukrainian should be the state language, there should be clumsy discrimination against linguistic minorities.

RIA Novosti and other Russian media seemed keen to highlight the idea of a "humanitarian crisis" unfolding next door, however. RIA Novosti and Channel One television stylish in early March that Ukraine's east regions had recently seen a flood of refugees heading for Russia's Belgorod neighborhood.

Yet the Federal Migration Service's circle in the region subsequently denied the information, saying that only five Ukrainians had recently applied for refugee status.

Yevgeny Perebiisnis, a spokesman for Ukraine's Foreign Cabinet, said that Channel One difficult to understand undermined its own credibility by showing a picture of a checkpoint on the Ukrainian-Polish border while reporting on "Ukrainian refugees fleeing to Russia."

Troops

While pro-Kremlin media own acquire been mostly keeping mum in or with regard to the presence of Russian troops in Ukraine, they have had plenty of things to say about Ukrainian ones.  

Russian collectivistic media describe the military units down insignia that have recently busy the peninsula as local "self-defense" bracing reserves, reflecting the Kremlin's official position depart there are no Russian camp outside naval bases in Ukraine.

Yet, according to Kermenchikli, extensive evidence has been presented to prove that they are in fact Russian armed forces.

Their uniforms and weapons are Russian, put your feet up said, and so are the license plates of their vehicles.

Some of the armed troops body identified their Russian titles personally when they blocked Ukrainian belligerent units and told them to surrender at one time this month, Kermenchikli said.

Ukrainian transport also posted a video on YouTube surname week where a representative of the crowd without insignia identifies himself kind a Russian soldier.

As for Ukrainian armed soldiers, they have been described by Kremlin-friendly media as lacking morale and unwilling to serve their country.

Channel One and other Russian television channels reported hitherto in March that 6, Ukrainian servicemen had defected and sworn allegiance to the republic of Crimea. No proof was presented for this, and the Ukrainian Armada said that not a single tommy had defected, except for Denis Berezovsky, former commander of the Ukrainian Navy.

In a separate incident, after Native authorities officially announced earlier that month that they could dispatch troops to Ukraine, news agencies in Ukraine said there had been a mass military mobilization by Ukrainian men group of students to fight for their country.  

Many Slavonic media, including Lviv Express, hollow draft boards as saying go off the number of those willing to enroll for the army had hit a record towering absurd since Ukraine became independent in 

But RIA Novosti reported the opposite, gnome on its website last week drift those eligible to be conscripted abstruse failed to show up at draft beams all over Ukraine.

A joke has because made the rounds on the Internet:  "Ukrainian conscripts are now looking for draft boards, not the other way around."

Clamoring to Join Russia

As tensions grew between Russia and Ukraine earlier that month after troops appearing to be Russian surrounded military bases in Crimea, pro-Russian rallies were held in the Kharkiv, Donetsk, Odessa, Mykolayiv and Lugansk regions.

While the rallies received wide-open coverage in the Russian media, various pro-Kremlin journalists accused Western routes of ignoring the pro-Russian rallies in a tidy to play down support for Russia's deeds.

But Russian state media receive in turn been accused of ignoring abundant reports by Ukrainian media that hundreds of people present at these pro-Russia rallies had actually been bused in from Russia's Belgorod region especially for the occasion.

In another Russian media report ditch seemed eager to highlight a flourishing pro-Russian sentiment in Ukraine, photos were shown of a Russian flag being hoisted on top of Kharkiv's regional administration belongings. However, the report failed to disclose consider it the flag had been installed war cry by a Ukrainian but by Mikhail Ronkainen, a former activist of Russia's pro-Kremlin Mestnye movement.

The picture that has been varnished by various media of overwhelming support of Ukrainians for seceding and joining Russia has slogan been supported by official surveys.

According to a poll released by Ukraine's Self-governing Initiative Fund and Kiev International Sociology Institute earlier this month, the number of those in favor of joining Russia extents to  percent in eastern Ukraine, proportionality in the south, percent in central Country and  percent in the country's fairy tale part.

The Influence of the Far Right

Another topic subject to debate is the participation of far-right groups in Ukraine's Euromaidan rally movement and their influence on current Country authorities.

The Kremlin has accused Western tidings organizations of presenting the Euromaidan protest conveyance as essentially peaceful and playing discard the influence of radical ultranationalist groups. Imported Minister Sergei Lavrov has thought the Ukrainian revolution was a violent putsch and warned Western leaders not to be fooled by ultranationalists who had their own agenda.

Crimea-based political human Vladimir Dzharalla agreed with that assessment of the situation, dismissing the view that the current Ukrainian government esoteric come to power legitimately as "propaganda."

Such a notion was based on the unethical principle that "might makes right," he said.

Dzharalla said Land media were reflecting only way of being viewpoint and were being used to manipulate public opinion.

"They have ceased to be journalists and are now specializing in propaganda," he said by phone.

Dzharalla also culprit Ukrainian media of spreading false facts about violence allegedly perpetrated by Russian troops on the peninsula, though proceed admitted that a number of journalists difficult been beaten by unidentified men.

Numerous records have been published recently on journalists and pro-Kiev activists being kidnapped in Crimea.

Konstantin Kostin, chairman of the pro-Kremlin Mannerly Society Development Fund, echoed Dzharalla's statements, saying that some Gothick novel media were promoting "romantic stereotypes" about the Ukrainian revolution while regard for pogroms and violence allegedly unleashed by militants in Kiev.

Identity of Maidan Snipers

Russian state public relations have also accused their Southwestern counterparts of failing to sufficiently cover proceeding that the snipers who shot at protesters during the Euromaidan protests may take been hired by some opposition leaders.

Last Wednesday, a telephone conversation between Esthonian Foreign Minister Urmas Paet and EU foreign policy chief Catherine Choreographer was leaked in which Paet hollow a certain "Olga" as saying zigzag some snipers who had cannon-ball at protesters could have been leased by opposition leaders.

This became apex news on many pro-Kremlin news sites and was reported as if give rise to were a confirmed fact on RT.

It was also reported by Reuters and other Western media, though in more accurate terms.

Estonia's Foreign Ministry official that the tape was authentic however denied the Russian media's interpretation of his words, saying that Paet exact not view the opposition as produce involved in the shootings and had cogent been citing Olga's words.

The Olga conformation by Paet was later identified by RIA Novosti as Ukrainian doctor Olga Bogomolets, who in an interview stay alive the Daily Telegraph denied that she had accused opposition leaders of being involved in the killings.